Monday, October 26, 2009

Northcote Leader Article

Hi all,

Thanks to everyone who could make time to come pose for a photo to accompany the Northcote Leader's article a couple of weeks ago. Sadly the photo didn't make the printed edition, but it's available online for us to admire...



Posted here for convenience:

Units Project Fears by Suzanne Robson



A PLAN to build almost 100 dwellings on a Northcote factory site overlooking Merri Creek has alarmed scores of Darebin residents.

More than 70 residents have objected to the planned Merri Pde development featuring a five-storey apartment block with 83 units and 16 townhouses.

Melbourne developer Jack Haber said the “appropriate” development would be a “vast improvement” on the graffiti-laden factory warehouse on the Northcote site. Two townhouses would be apartments on the corner of Bridge St and Merri Pde. But residents said the “scale and density” of the development on a site about 3800sq m would have a “severe impact on the character and amenity of a neighbourhood made up of mainly one-storey heritage houses.”

Bridge St resident Mike Flattley, who lives next to the site, said future residents of the new five-storey apartments would be able to look into private backyards in Bridge and Union streets.

The planned development also wasn’t “appropriately aligned” to Merri Creek and didn’t effectively address the impact on traffic and waste management.

“If it was open to the parkland that would respond and complement (it),” he said.

“Development of the site is something we want to see but we want it to be appropriate development that responds to the character of the neighbourhood.”

Mr Haber rejected claims made by a Melbourne daily paper that he would buy ready-made apartments from China for the project.

Modular apartments were one option being considered, but he had not yet made a decision.

“It is an innovation that many people are considering,” he said.

“The Government is encouraging more housing and high-density development, particularly on main roads close to transport.”

Each town house would have car parks and the block of apartments would have a basement car park with 51 parking spots.

“We have designed the building so from all vantage points around the site the fifth-storey is barely visible,” he said.

4 comments:

  1. What do you propose we do to address traffic and housing problems? I personally think these types of developments need more encouragement - not blanket rejection.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Rob,

    I don't think any particular encouragement is required from the general community, as they're pretty much steaming through VCAT whether anyone likes them or not. As stated in the article, and elsewhere on the blog, we're not anti-development and certainly not seeking a blanket rejection. We want the site developed. But it has to be something we can all live with. It can't all be driven by the profit motive.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi all

    I know it has been a while but can anyone provide me with an update on this project and whether it went through?
    Thanks
    Virginie

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Virginie,

    Yep, four storey tower block and Bridge St townhouses are nearing completion as we speak - Union St townhouses haven't started construction yet.

    ReplyDelete