"Based on the issues described in previous sections, it is expected that the benefits to the community obtained from the investment on the road expansion are extremely limited. Road widening could only generate benefits to those who drive regularly on Merri Parade. As previously discussed, any benefits to these people would quickly dissolve as yet more traffic uses Merri Parade, resulting in the same level of congestion as currently exists, but an additional lane of it. A large proportion of the drivers using Merri Parade are assumed to be through traffic from north of Darebin.
In terms of a benefit cost ratio (BCR) (that is, value for money), a project like this would score very poorly, in contrast to a public transport improvement project, or even a cycling improvement project.
Studies show that high-quality, time-competitive public transport tends to attract travellers who would otherwise drive, which reduces congestion on parallel roads. Although public transport does not usually eliminate road congestion, it can significantly reduce congestion intensity on roads like Merri Parade."See the full report on page 44 of the meeting agenda online.
So that was pretty good. However, the Mayor then tabled a counter-proposal as follows:
My Merri Hiiiiiiiigggghwaaaaaaayyyy |
Anyway, Council apparently approved the motion to approach VicRoads with this recommendation, except Crs. Tim Laurence and Trent McCarthy. Also, there will be some form of community consultation!
There is another agenda we aren't seeing here. It suggests a kind of incrementalism, whereby the road is first (pointlessly) widened without increasing capacity, providing scope for further lanes to be added at an undisclosed point in the future. There is no obvious benefit to anyone from pursuing this incredible waste of Council resources and residents' time. So the motivation for this dogged pursuit of widening Merri Parade has me quite concerned.
That [incrementalism] is a serious concern, and it seems too big a risk for us to take.
ReplyDelete